Why are you so angry? Who said J4J doesn't want the legal system to work? What is wrong with bringing attention to Jane, and remaining nameless so the focus can be on her? Citizens are VOLUNTEERING to put up signs on their own property. The closure is not for THEM, it is for JANE'S FAMILY and the people who loved her. Who wouldn't want that?

Who said there is no need for a trial, what source has told you there is no proof, how do you know there are no witnesses, and how do you know there is no incriminating evidence to arrest him on? Everything I have seen in print states that the Prosecutors office has not, and will not, discuss their case. It is true that there are many bloggers, on multiple sites that feel Bob is guilty just as there is bloggers who question his involvement. But again you have distorted your facts (can’t fault you for that you made your career doing that). Justice4Janes press release clearly states “The purpose of the campaign is to show in a visible way the Grosse Pointe community's desire to bring to justice whoever murdered one of its most respected members. It affirms a trust in law enforcements' efforts on her case and stands behind them.”
Nowhere as Good Old Pete states, do they say Bob did it.
To be fair to Pete, there are some who have blogged on their site and others who feel Bob is guilty, they relied on rumors and fragmented facts to form their opinions, kinda like Pete did when he blogged his opinion of this article. But just like Pete, they have a right to their opinion, right or wrong.

"But just because he lives in paradise doesn't mean he doesn't deserve at least the same fair trial he'd get in the ghetto."

He lives in paradise? Listening to him lately, he describes it more like a living hell.

My take is that Pete Waldmeir is a grumpy ex-newspaper man and frustrated ex-electected city official that isn't slow to give his opinion and likes to see his words in print. Haha.

Look above, the article gives the website for ordering.

Btw, if people put yard signs on their lawns, that's hardly being anonymous --- and I'm told all 4 organizers from the Pointes have yard signs on their lawns, plus Justice for Jane car magnets. Don't get why anyone objects to standing up for Jane.

Quite frankly, I'm tired of cowards not using their own names. Please gather some courage. It's totally okay- no one will be mad at you and your opinion will matter. With fake names, no one cares what you say. Surprise yourself and have a little backbone.

Like you, I too want to see justice done. Unlike you, I do not see evidence of an anonymous mob. What do I see? The fact that the victim has become lost in all the sensationalistic, self-centered press melees. Who has spoken up for Jane, Mr. Waldmeir? Her widower? You? I've read the blogs and studied the comments. Have you? Because if you did, you'd surely understand the need for someone to stand up for the victim in this case. That amidst all the press coverage, a group of community members wish to ensure the victim is not forgotten. To remember the good, not the evil. Why should they all throw names and faces out there at present? They are far safer in numbers and anonymous. Lastly, your comments are beyond skewed considering they are coming from a supposed unbiased veteran of the Fourth Estate. As for the pearls? Why you sound like a misogynist to me. But what do I know. If Daddy were alive, I'd ask him. He used to know you.

...and not to mention, the mentally challenged hit man is behind bars, but Jane's "real" killer is still on the loose. Jane's friends and family should be concerned for their own safety, while seeking justice for murder.